What's New:
Recent Quotes:
November 22, 2009 3:28:54 PM EST

News Story

Monday Morning Outlook: Will Ben Make the Right Call?
Monday September 17, 2007 06:57:42 EDT
By: Bernie Schaeffer

All things considered anemic trading volume, record-high crude oil, major brokerage downgrades the markets did pretty darn well last week. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) moved 2.5% higher for the week, and (by the skin of its teeth) managed a Friday finish atop its 10-week and 20-week moving averages for the first time since July 20. The Nasdaq Composite (COMP) was 1.4% higher for the week, edging back above the 2,600 mark, and the S&P 500 Index (SPX) rose 2.1%. All indices are in positive territory on a year-to-date basis, the Dow being the strongest performer in 2007 with a 7.9% appreciation rate.

But we've still got about 30 hours of pacing and nail-biting until we can get down to the business of figuring out the future direction of this market. At 2:15 p.m. Eastern time Tuesday, Ben Bernanke and the rest of the Federal Open Market Committee will come up for air with the decision market watchers have been anxiously awaiting since, well, the conclusion of the rate-setting board's late-July meeting. The investing world became even more anxious for the next rate decision when the August jobs report surprised to the downside. So with many investors preferring the safety of the sidelines, here we continue to wait, and as Tom Petty taught all of us, "the waiting is the hardest part."

The debate has increasingly been not if the Fed will lower rates, but by how much. On Friday, October fed-funds futures were fully pricing in a 25-basis-point cut and a 66% chance for a 50-basis-point reduction. The December contract fully prices in a rate cut to 4.25% (a full percentage point) by year end. This was up from 94% odds seen on Thursday. And a CNBC survey indicated that 18 of the 21 primary dealers who conduct business with the central bank expect a quarter-point rate cut to an even 5.0%. A minority of respondents think the Fed will lower rates by a half-point (50 basis points) to 4.75%.

Expectations for a Fed bail-out are running high, and if you're at all familiar with this site, you know the danger of high expectations. The futures market doesn't even seem to be entertaining the notion that the Fed will make the colossal error of failing to cut rates at all. This kind of surprise would be disastrous, and all bets will be off for the technical and sentiment indicators I discuss below.

The S&P 500 Index (SPX) continues to hover between support at 1,450 and resistance at its 80-day moving average. The 1,450 mark is home to massive put open interest (271,000 open puts in the September and October series combined) and the 80-day moving average was first breached on July 26 and has subsequently defined the top of the index's recent trading range. The Fed's failure to act would likely trump the former, while a cut of 50 basis points might be enough to drive the index through moving-average resistance and a potential return to late-July levels. A cut of 25 basis points might amount to a "non event," given such an action is fully factored into the market. Regardless of what the Fed does or does not do, price action in either direction could be exaggerated by the effects of expiration week, which has had a positive bias going back to January 2006.

Despite the respectable jumps higher in the market indices last week, the CBOE Market Volatility Index (VIX) remains above its 20-day moving average, which is a concern for the market. The SPX has lost only about 5 points (0.3%) since September 4, but the VIX rally during this same period is disproportionately strong (2.14 points, or 9.4%). It's entirely possible that the price action in the headline fear barometer is due to uncertainty with the Fed, and a growing consensus that if the Fed lowers rates by the expected 25 basis points, stocks may not react positively.

And I see these continued elevated VIX levels as quite rational, as it is becoming increasingly clear to me that a minimum of a 50-point cut is needed and that Bernanke is not likely to deliver on it. The rationale for such an aggressive cut is amply supported in three very recent thought-provoking media pieces.

  • "The employment statistics and the bond market are combining to send out a warning that has been heard only rarely in the past two decades: A recession is coming in the United States. The two charts show the double warning. Both charts warned of an economic downturn before the 1990 and 2001 recessions, and they are doing so again. While each has arguably registered false warnings, they have never done so together ... In bond market jargon, the opposite condition is an inverted yield curve. And when it is very inverted, the recession warning is sent. At the widest spread this week, on Monday, the yield on two-year Treasuries was down to 3.854 percent, while the fed funds target rate was 5.25 percent. That difference, of 1.396 percentage points, is the largest since early January 2001 ...The second chart shows the six-month changes in the number of people with jobs, as reported by the Labor Department's household survey. In a growing economy, with the labor age population rising, the number of jobs almost always increases. But not now. The August employment figures, reported last week, showed 145,794,000 people with jobs, or 125,000 fewer than in February. When that number goes into negative territory, it is a warning of a slowdown ...To be sure, there have been just two recessions in two decades, which is not enough to validate any set of forecast tools. But if one arrives, there will be criticism that the Federal Reserve was too slow to cut interest rates as it ignored the threat of an inverted yield curve, and that it focused on inflation for too long. 'With the core inflation rate comfortably close to 2 percent, and the Treasury market begging for ease for over a year, if it turns out to be a recession, it will also be a policy error,' said Robert Barbera, chief economist of ITG."
    ----(The New York Times "Double Warning That a Recession May Be on the Way" 9/15/07)

  • "And while most bets are on a quarter-point easing, from 5.25% to point reduction, to 4.75%. Over the past few weeks, the actual interest rate on fed funds -- the 'daily effective rate,' as distinct from the target -- has already been running close to 5.0%. So if the target itself is lowered to 5.0%, that quarter-point easing might seem more reactive rather than proactive, merely ratifying what has been happening rather than breaking new ground. A half-point cut to 4.75% would symbolize bolder resolve. And while the appearance of having overreacted is a danger, there might be added potency in the very fact that it is being resorted to by an FOMC that was reluctant to use it ... Instead of lowering the target rate on federal funds, the rate at which banks lend overnight money to each other, he lowered the discount rate, the rate at which the Fed makes direct loans to banks, while simultaneously making these loans more attractive. Since the loans accept a broad range of collateral, the hope was that unfairly tainted debt could be parked with the Fed until the blockage lifted. The experiment has mainly failed."
    ----(Barron's "The Case For A Half-Point Fed-Funds Cut" 9/17/07)

  • "The time has come for the Federal Reserve to cut the federal funds interest rate substantially, starting on a path from the current 5.25% to 4.25% and possibly even less. Without such a policy shift, the U.S. economy faces the risk of a significant economic downturn ... Fed action to lower interest rates cannot solve the credit market problems, but it would help the economy: by stimulating the demand for housing, autos and other consumer durables; by encouraging a more competitive dollar to stimulate increased net exports; by raising share prices to increase both business investment and consumer spending; and by freeing up spendable cash for homeowners with adjustable-rate mortgages. A reduction of the federal funds rate would not be a bailout for individual borrowers and lenders who are suffering from their past mistakes. Any such targeted bailout would be wrong, encouraging more reckless behavior in the future. But it would also be a mistake to resist an interest rate cut and risk a serious economic downturn merely to avoid the indirect effect of helping those market participants ... Although the extent of the possible decline in economic activity is uncertain, the economy could suffer a very serious downturn if the triple threat from the credit market, housing construction, and consumer spending materializes with full force. A sharp reduction in the interest rate would attenuate that very bad outcome. Today's 5.25% federal funds rate is relatively tight in comparison to the historic average of a 2% real rate."
    ----(The Wall Street Journal op-ed piece by Martin Feldstein - chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers under President Reagan and a professor at Harvard 9/12/07)

    Unfortunately, the financial media in the aggregate has been engaging with Bernanke in a game of "Prove you're a real man and that you won't cave to Wall Street and that you're not like Greenspan by staying the course and at the very most cutting rates by 25 points and in exchange we'll continue to refer to you as a stand up guy. But all bets are off if you capitulate." And quite frankly I haven't seen much from the rookie Fed chairman to indicate that he has what it takes to do the right thing and buck the media consensus.

    So while I believe many ingredients are in place for a sharp rally off what may have been a major market bottom in August, there is no place in such a scenario for a major Fed policy error. Should such an error occur, I would expect the market to sell off to the point that the Fed is forced to correct its error. And it is uncertain whether Fed action at that point will prove to be too little, too late. I therefore continue to advise investors to consider protecting their long positions with call options on the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX), which would rise sharply in value on a major market downleg.

    This week, we have the Product Price Index (PPI) for August hitting Tuesday morning and the companion Consumer Price Index (CPI) coming across the tape Wednesday morning. Earnings reports pick up a little as we digest quarterly results from Adobe Systems (ADBE), Best Buy (BBY), Nike (NKE), FedEx (FDX), and others. Also notable will be earnings news from a contingent of broker dealers Lehman Brothers (LEH), Bear Stearns (BSC), Goldman Sachs (GS), and A.G. Edwards (AGE). In addition to the Fed, investors will be focusing heavily on the financial results of these financial companies, looking for more clues on the real impact of the current credit crisis.

    But realistically, it's all about the Fed until 2:15 p.m. Tuesday. As investors, lenders, and homeowners alike await the results of the most highly anticipated Fed meeting in years, I can't help but feel a little nervous (and a little dubious). As I wrapped up a Schaeffer's Media Outtake on September 4:

    "A 50 basis-point rate cut is needed, preferably before the next Fed meeting on September 18th [9/17 edit: so much for that]. It is needed not for the purpose of bailing out profligacy on Main Street and on Wall Street, but to correct the consequences of the Federal Reserve's excessive rate hikes. And I can come as close to guaranteeing as I possibly can when speaking of the markets that if September 18th comes and goes with no such cut, the markets will not long thereafter force it out of the cold, dead hands of the current Fed Chairman."

    And now a few sectors of note...

    Dissecting The Sectors
    Sector
    Base Metals/Copper
    Bullish

    Sentiment: Despite the continued strong price action from 3 of our favorite copper names - Southern Copper (PCU), Freeport McMoRan Copper & Gold (FCX), and BHP Billiton (BHP) skepticism continues to rule the roost. Analysts have handed the trio of stocks 13 "buy" ratings, 12 "holds" and a "strong sell," meaning future upgrades (or additional broker coverage) could help draw positive attention to the stocks. The options crowd remains bearishly aligned on PCU and BHP, judging by respective Schaeffer's put/call open interest ratio (SOIR) readings of 1.46 (the 88th percentile) ant 1.53 (the 79th percentile). As for FCX, its Schaeffer's put/call open interest ratio (SOIR) weighs in at 0.62, higher than 55% of the past year's worth of readings.

    Outlook: We are staying the course with our positive take on the copper group PCU, BHP, and FCX continue to look impressive from an overall Expectational standpoint. All 3 stocks have been steadily appreciating along 10-day-moving-average support, and all ostensibly have sideline reserves from which to draw additional buying power in the near term. Long-term copper futures tacked on more than 4% last week and muscled back above their 10-day and 20-day moving averages, which are now turned higher. Additionally, a disappointing result from Tuesday's Fed meeting could negatively impact the stock market, sending investors scrambling for safe havens such as metals.
    Sector
    Retail Growth
    Bullish

    Sentiment: Overall, the retailing sector isn't seeing a lot of love on Wall Street. Of the 1,155 analysts' ratings on retail names, just 44.8% are of the "buy" variety. Additionally, composite short interest on the group has been shooting higher for the last several months and is near a multi-year high. We continue to look positively at growth names including Blue Nile (NILE) and Amazon.com (AMZN). Both names have high short-interest-to-float ratios, and both stand to benefit from analysts' upgrades. Other names to watch include footwear names Deckers (DECK) and Crocs (CROX), widely talked-about stocks with strong sales numbers.

    Outlook: NILE is now trading back above its 10-day and 20-day trendlines, and AMZN, is a chip-shot away from a 7-year high. Another name we've closely followed of late Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) continues to trend higher against a backdrop of skepticism. While consumer spending is a concern during these uncertain market times, growth names such as these should continue to outperform. Broadly speaking, the AMEX Retail HOLDRs Trust (RTH) closed above its 10-week moving average last week for the first time since July 13.
    Sector
    Financials
    Bearish

    Sentiment: During the past week, the Schaeffer's put/call open interest ratio (SOIR) for the Select Sector SPDR Financial Fund (XLF) continued to skew lower, hitting an annual nadir of 2.49. In other words, the options-trading crowd has never been more bullishly aligned on the financials group this year. Meanwhile, the ETF is trading below its 10-month and 20-month moving averages and is near an annual low itself. Separating the group between banking and broker/dealer names, it appears as though optimism is greater for brokers. The composite SOIR for the brokerage sector stands at 0.37, lower than 90% of the past year's readings. The banking group's composite SOIR is closer to the pessimistic end of the spectrum.

    Outlook: This week, the group will be in focus as the Fed makes its interest-rate decision and a quartet of heavy-hitters Lehman Brothers (LEH), Bear Stearns (BSC), Goldman Sachs (GS), and A.G. Edwards (AGE) report quarterly earnings. BSC and LEH have Zacks ratings of 5.0 (the lowest possible), while GS and the recently bought out AGE have ratings of 3.0. These ratings which indicate earnings momentum do not suggest a powerful turn in the earnings confessional. High expectations on any of these names or the group as a whole could lead to larger-than-average declines in the event of a negative earnings surprise.

    Copyright Schaeffer's Investment Research http://www.schaeffersresearch.com

    News powered by SchaeffersResearch.com
  • Trading Corner